Euro, Cable, and Swissy

EURUSD and GBPUSD are up; USDCHF is down. With equity futures bidding up so strongly over night as I wrote in my last post, there was little doubt the dollar was in for a drubbing today. I went long both the Euro and Cable and short the Swissy earlier today. They’re all in about 45 to 50 pips profit and all are profit stopped. I had to use both the USDCHF chart to decide to buy the first two and short the Swissy. It was the only definitive chart.

Someone emailed me the other day and asked me to please give signals in advance. First, I’m not a signal service. They don’t usually work, anyway because the market can change in an instant—start contracting whereas before it was expanding and vice versa, etc. Second, I hope that by showing why I did something (and actually showing I’m in the position—let’s lynch all these so-called gurus who only talk and don’t trade but are still out there pushing their signal services) that someone will be able to learn to trade on their own. Besides, often I do give levels I plan on buying or selling. You just have to stay alert and take the trade at those levels. If anyone has a pair they want me to specifically comment on, just post a comment here asking and I will.

Getting back to the Euro, it hasn’t found its way to a definitive close above 1.48. Heaven knows its bulls have pushed and pushed and pushed. As long as that’s the case, I’d prefer to be short, but the buy signals were just too compelling on the shorter term charts this morning. I’m keeping my stop close because I expect to be stopped out on all of these at a small profit. Should the Euro manage to start decisively closing above 1.4868 then I’ll start looking for long positions. Here are the hourly charts for both the USDCHF and EURUSD. The GBPUSD is too boring to throw up at this point: None of the above are trade recommendations. Remember that trading involves substantial risk.

© Dianne Fecteau, 2009. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without the express written permission of the author.

Whippy behavior

EURJPY stopped out at breakeven shortly after my first posting earlier today. Is it really going to be this kind of week? After taking a quick look at the hourly chart, I shorted again at 131 this time. My reason is it again topped at the same level as where prior heavy selling came in. It also shows high wicks on the candles, indicating higher prices are being rejected. A new trend line intersects with resistance. We’ll have to see where it goes. I’m also short GBPJPY with similar behavior.

© Dianne Fecteau, 2009. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without the express written permission of the author.

EURUSD and EURJPY

EURUSD

My experience this week with the Euro has been decidedly mixed. Monday I was short. That stopped out with a loss of 25 pips. Yesterday I was long. That profit stopped overnight at 40 pips. Now the pair is hanging around its typical resistance level, wondering, I guess, which way to go.

Being whipsawed tells me that the market doesn’t know what to do at the moment. Nor do I. Bowing to Gann’s advice of staying out until I have a better sense of direction, you can bet that I will be tearing up those charts in the next hour or so.

EURJPY

I did short the EURJPY yesterday at 130.83. It’s up 103 pips as of now, 6:20 AM EST. Where might it go? Let’s look at the charts.

On the daily chart there are some interesting patterns. First, is the up channel from early in the year (its lines are drawn in black). When it fell out of that channel it entered some sort of corrective pattern or perhaps a consolidation. That’s confined between the purple lines. While the bottom purple line shows an up trend, the red line indicates a slight down trend since June (the red line). This shows it coiling in a triangle. Going along with the upward trending red line there is also divergence with the RSI.

What to make out of all this? In part it depends upon your personal approach to trading but the most conservative statement is that the market is pausing right now, storing up energy to make another move.

Why am I short? It broke below the triangle once. Now it looks as though it’s doing so again. It’s as thought it’s compelled to at least venture lower. Also, one can make the case for a double top although it’s not perfect. But if it is one, it broke below its neckline and is hanging out there.

Another thing is that divergence. Divergence has been all over the charts lately and it’s troubling. Why? If a price is trending up you expect to see any particular indicator you’re looking at also trending up. That’s known as confirming the price trend. When it doesn’t do so, that’s known as divergence. Divergence can be an early warning of a trend change. Note the words “can be.” It doesn’t mean it is a trend change. It means you have to watch prices more carefully than you might if everything was moving together. Divergence can last a long time. That’s why it’s not tradable in and of itself.

I don’t enter trades based only on one time frame. What really caused me to short was the daily in combination with the signals on the hourly. There it broke a short term uptrend line on both price and RSI and had a bearish candle.

Here’s the daily and hourly:

None of the above are trade recommendations. Remember that trading involves substantial risk.

© Dianne Fecteau, 2009. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without the express written permission of the author.

Australia

Australia hiked its interest rate last night. AUDUSD and AUDNZD both moved up smartly. I bought AUDNZD based on the chart I posted yesterday. I am now out. Why not stay in since I often do that when I’m in profit and can move my stop to such a point that I keep some of those profits?

One reason is I’m thinking of shorting. There is the downtrend as you can see from the chart yesterday. Always go with the trend, you hear. Well hip, hip hooray for the trend followers. What are you supposed to do in a sideways market? I’m not afraid to go against the trend if I see clear signals. Being with the trend usually leads to bigger profits and it’s often “safer.” But in this case, because of conflicting signals across different time frames and because of the current price behavior I lean short. So I had to close my long position.

With both pairs, I’m surprised there’s not more oomph from the rate hike. Ozzie should be on track for .9000 and wouldn’t that be grand? But let’s watch it. Let’s see how it unfolds. Many people are already counting their profits from that level and the market has a way of not going along with the best laid plans of mice and men.

None of the above are trade recommendations. Remember that trading involves substantial risk.

© Dianne Fecteau, 2009. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without the express written permission of the author.

Thursday morning trades, canoodling with EW Theory, and other thoughts

GBPUSD

Yesterday's short trade is still on. I took a third off the table earlier and have my stop at plus 60 pips. I may move it again soon. I also took another short position earlier this morning and have the stop at breakeven. Note on the three hour chart below how RSI respected its Fib levels. The horizontal orange lines are why I said yesterday I wanted to short around 1.6150. I explained yesterday that I shorted under that because of price behavior. The thing to watch now, in my mind, is how the pair begins to behave as it nears the short uptrend line. Here’s the 3-hour chart but I’ll be watching shorter time frames.
USDCHF

My short was obviously taken out yesterday morning at profit. I entered long on the pullback where it continues to do well. But it’s nearing the top of that channel I’ve shown on prior charts so I need to assess this.

EURUSD

I got in and out of a quick short yesterday. I’m carefully analyzing the recent price activity. My “belief” is that the pair is headed down but you know how beliefs can blind you to what’s really happening? A good price analysis will tell the story.

AUDUSD

Yesterday I wrote that I was out of the Ozzie until I could form a clearer picture. I hypothesized that perhaps we could be in some sort of B wave (Elliott wave speak for corrective waves that are often choppy and difficult to decipher).

I’m not a big fan of the Elliott Wave Theory (EWT) for actual trading because it’s difficult to use it for trades by itself (although I know some people do and more power to them if it is profitable for them). I do, though, count waves. I do spend oodles of time canoodling with my Elliott Wave Principle book (Frost and Prechter).

Why does EWT appear so difficult? Why is it that there are so many interpretations? One reason is that while there are several rules—and these are inviolate—there are many more guidelines. These are just that—guidelines. The guidelines lead to arguments among EWT practitioners. Another reason is that many so-called EWT practitioners don’t seem to have memorized the rules and say things that simply aren’t true. A third reason, as I’ve mentioned before, is that the corrections are devilishly difficult to identify until well after the fact as to what they are and what they mean. While they’re in process they can lead to some strong arguments among practitioners.

Arguing over interpretations of anything on the charts is a valid activity. After all, if one person or theory held the absolute answer then that would be the fountain of youth, Eldorado, and the lost city of Atlantis rolled into one. Wouldn’t all who practiced that theory be lucky? But people that hold strongly to any given theory get extreme in their arguments, often using emotion where reason fails. So you hear such phrases as “I have this on absolute authority from a close relative of Elliott himself who verified it had never been written down and therefore I’m right and you’re not and you’re also stupid.”

Where I find EWT most useful is in gauging market psychology. It supplements my other analysis. I won’t necessarily act on a wave count that seems to be present if it goes against other factors I consider more important.

Briefly, since I don’t have the time to write a treatise on the topic, certain waves are technically strong and have real oomph. Others are not strong at all. Often, such as the B wave I mentioned as a possibility yesterday, they exhibit divergences, non-confirmations and the like.

Getting back to the AUDUSD, I studied charts dating back 30 years yesterday, in an attempt to clear up my confusion over what the pair was doing. I can make a case for three alternative wave counts based on the monthly chart. This is not helpful. One can’t trade this. But it’s a good exercise to write down the reasons for each. Briefly, though, my favored wave count is that we’re in a primary wave two correction (wave one being the steep drop from July, 2008). If this is true then it could retrace most or all of wave one. So it can’t exceed .9851. Since its high yesterday was .8860, this isn’t helpful, either. At least not to me, a small trader, who is not going to buy now, damn the torpedoes, and put a stop quite a distance away. I can make a good case for why I should have gone long at .8590 and stayed in. Had I done that I wouldn’t be doing all this work right now. I didn’t buy but should have doesn’t cut it in trading. Or anywhere else.

So I need to work on a smaller chart, right? Yes. But before leaving the monthly chart I drew an uptrend line from the lows earlier in the decade and it is coming in right about where the pair traded yesterday. Sometimes these old trend lines, once violated, serve as resistance. If I draw a horizontal line back in time to the early 80s on the monthly chart, I also see this is an interesting area known as polarity. Price has roughly used it for support and resistance.

Is it worth a short then? Well this would tie in with my belief we might be in a B wave correction. But there’s a bit of cognitive dissonance here. I’ve been calculating resistance ever since the secondary low in November, 2008. At each key resistance level I dutifully lightened or closed my longs, only to have to find a way to get back in. I’ve been trying to go long since the beginning of September and had some decent trades, e.g. one at 90 pips, but, for the last couple of weeks, have only found short setups where I’ve made small amounts of pips or taken small losses. (I’m not trashing 20 pip profits—they can add up—but one hopes for better than that, usually).

Here’s my opinion. It’s in an uptrend although it seems to be struggling with robust, sustained up moves. It’s at a resistance level that held once, yesterday. I may short it if it reaches .8860 again, depending on the behavior on the charts. Or I may go long if I can find behavior to support that position. That’s the best I can do at this point. Wait and see.

None of the above are trade recommendations. Remember that trading involves substantial risk.

© Dianne Fecteau, 2009. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without the express written permission of the author.

Uncertainty

AUDUSD—standing aside for now

I’ve been a bit buffeted by the Ozzie during the last several days. I’ve been out at breakeven or tiny little profits in its sideways movements. I stopped out overnight at .8770 with a loss of 48 pips. This morning I took a closer look.

From the longer term charts—monthly, weekly, and daily—we’re still in an uptrend although the movement has been strongly sideways the last couple of weeks. Lately it’s been waffling with ranges, false or premature breakouts from ranges, negative divergences, etc. Now it looks as though it may be pushing up which is what I thought it would do in the first place.

Why, I ask myself, would a pair behave this way? I mean besides the obvious reason that nobody can make up their mind about what to do—is the sky falling or is it not? Maybe that is the reason but what else comes to mind? I think about what Frost and Prechter wrote in their book, Elliott Wave Principle (New Classics Library, 10th ed. 2005), about B waves on page 81:

B waves are phonies…sucker plays, bull traps, speculators’ paradise….[They’re] rarely technically strong, and are virtually always doomed to complete retracement by wave C. If the analyst can easily say to himself, “There’s something wrong with this market,” chances are it’s a B wave.

That’s what I’ve been thinking to myself—there’s something wrong with this market. Of course there may be something wrong with me and my analysis but I’m not going there right now.

OK. What do I have? A belief we’re in an uptrend although Dow Theory tells me it could be an intermediate correction. A market that seems unclear. What choice do I have? I can only stand aside. As Gann wrote, if you “don’t know what to do, there is but one thing to do. Get out and wait until you know there is a definite trend.” When I see something more clearly and have a good entry point, I’ll trade it.

USD/CHF

I’m out of this pair I bought at 1.0288 and have a short on from near the top of the channel at 1.0386. Remember that yesterday I wrote it could bump its head and scoot back to its lower trend line? Well it did. Look at the candles as it approached the top of the channel on the hourly chart:
Now it’s falling out of its channel. Is this a fake move prior to all the news today? (ADP, GDP, Corporate Profits, and CPI). Look at how RSI is dipping. Note the negative divergence. All this is not good. I am, after all, in an overall downtrend as I pointed out yesterday. I’m uncertain here, too, but will stay in the trade until I’m stopped out at profit. Hmm. There seems to be a theme of uncertainty this morning.

EURUSD

I stopped out overnight with 100 pips profit. Not bad, but what’s up with the Euro? I’m analyzing it now and will post later. Hopefully I won’t have to say I’m uncertain, LOL.

GBPUSD

Thank goodness I don’t have to say I’m uncertain! Alas, there’s no trade at the moment. I consider the market to be contracting and I’m waiting to sell, hopefully at or above 1.6150. I’ll post more, later.

None of the above is a trade recommendation. These are just my early morning thoughts. Remember that trading involves substantial risk.

© Dianne Fecteau, 2009. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without the express written permission of the author.

Observation, Generalization, Verification--Euro and other trades

I’m still short the Euro from the sell order that was triggered last Friday at 1.4712. I moved my stop to 100 pips profit if taken out. In addition, I this moment (10AM EST) took a third of my position off the table at 170 pips profit.

I wondered yesterday if I’d see another push up in the Euro. It hasn’t happened yet. One can see a few reasons for being short this pair. Some of them (from the three hour chart below) are:

1) It broke below an uptrend channel (on daily as well as the 3- hour)
2) There was prior divergence between the RSI and the upward movement in price
3) The 1.47 area was proving to be resistance
4) It broke below trough (1.4723) of a double top on the 3-hour chart
5) Long bearish candles were taking out small bullish candles

Some might argue a Head and Shoulder (H&S) pattern was forming on the three hour. If so, it’s a bit messy. More important is that it’s currently loitering just below the neckline. Until that’s definitively broken, there is no pattern. This is something new traders often forget. “Double top!” they’ll say, or “Head and Shoulders!” They correctly detect the beginnings of the pattern but don’t wait until it proves itself to be really that. Good observation of the possible but too much generalization and no verification. Trading is a matter of patience (forbearance, I wrote earlier this month).

But there is enough here to say, in short, a short. If it continues down and definitively breaks the upward channel on the weekly chart this could be the beginning of something big. Before one starts counting profits, though, note the three hour bullish divergence on the three hour chart. We’ll just have to continue watching. Here’s the three hour chart:

By the way, most will realize that as far as correlation goes this is a mirror of my long USD/CHF trade. I could have doubled up in either instead of trading them both. The important point, though, is that I realized this as I calculated position size for each trade.

Last week I wrote that I shorted the AUD/USD at .8738. It stopped yesterday at 20 pips profit. Talk about sideways movement. I shorted again at .8722. As soon as I finish writing this I’m going to analyze this again. This is how I spend my days as a trader. Analyzing and re-analyzing price movement from several different points of view. When I first started trading I heard many stories about how people would trade from the beach, grabbing 500 pips here or a thousand pips there. It hasn’t proven to be the reality for me. I have to work at this stuff.

The GBP/USD has had its fun with me, stopping me out yet again at break even. Talk about the need for more analysis. I’m also out of GBP/JPY.

None of the above is a trade recommendation. You have to develop your own ideas. I only hope to show some of the tools I use that can help you do so. Remember that trading involves substantial risk. Get written permission from Mommy before you attempt it but only if you and Mommy have a good financial cushion and are risking money you can afford to lose.

© Dianne Fecteau, 2009. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without the express written permission of the author.

Could the report of its demise...? (USD/CHF 9/29)

Anyone following my dance with the USD/CHF knows it stopped out Monday morning with the measly 20 pips profit. This can be frustrating. It may be a sign of what I’m really doing here which is trading against the trend. The pips just aren’t there; it’s a correction. It can also be the mark of a trend petering out—remember that bottoming (and topping) is a process and not a one day event (usually).

I say it could be contra-trend because although shorter time frames are showing an uptrend, the overall daily and weekly chart show a downtrend. However I was true to my word that I would buy if it touched its hourly uptrend line. That happened yesterday at 1.0288.

This pair is in an upward channel right now. The Elliott Wave theorists can refrain from bombarding me with how this is a correction. The cycle hunters can back off as well. I will disregard the skepticism about the USD; I will disregard the remarks of everyone from World Bank president Zoellick to Chinese central bank governor, Zhou Xiaochuan, to Uncle Tad (I mean the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development aka UNCTAD. I will also disregard optimism. I will not, to paraphrase Mark Twain, ask if the reports of the USD demise are greatly exaggerated. Well, I can ask it. But I'm not going to trade on it.

As a trader, I read the market. I ask, “Can I make a case for a trade here?” If I can, there’s greater probability the trade will make money. There’s still probability for loss. Once I calculate the loss (that’s before I calculate profit) I know if I can place my trade in such a way that the risk won’t give rise to a throbbing pain in my stomach and anxiety that will have me hovering above the key board.

In the short term, I believe I can trade this pair. Here’s the hourly chart I’m working from: The pair is now up 98 pips as of 6:48 AM EST and my profit stop is guaranteeing me 20 of them. I’m getting ready to move my stop to take a bit more because it’s possible that the pair will hit its head on the upward line of its channel, say “Ouch!” and scoot back to its trend line. At which point I would buy again with my super tight stop. On and on the story goes. At least until it doesn’t.

Now look at the daily chart. Here you see a pronounced downtrend. You also see how laughably small this little uptick is in the overall scheme of things. Selling rallies in a downtrend is always the “safer” way to trade. I may do so at some point in this rally (although I'm hard-pressed to call this a rally. It's more evocative of a sputter). But for now, I’m going to wait to see.

None of the above is a trade recommendation. Remember that trading involves substantial risk.

© Dianne Fecteau, 2009. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without the express written permission of the author.

Monday morning in the Ozzie

Last week I wrote that I shorted the AUD/USD at .8738. I’m still short. After hitting a low this morning of .8587 it’s back up a bit. Currently I’m at 94 pips profit as I write this. I’ve moved my stop to keep 20 of those pips. I may move it closer depending on how the pair behaves in the next hour or so. It’s well back into the consolidation range I wrote about extensively in the past couple of weeks. 45°

Here’s my one-hour, three box point and figure (P&F) chart. Notice the simple triple top it broke on its ascent. It could head back to that level before it resumes its climb. That would make a nice profit target of .8480 to .8520. What’s important to remember is that the pair remains technically in an overall uptrend that began in March. If the pair violates the trend lines I’ll be happier being short in this pair (actually very happy). But until that happens, I’m thinking reaction in an uptrend. That doesn’t mean you can’t make money from going counter to the trend. It does mean you have to be alert and not get all gaga over the trade. Now that I think about it, never get all gaga over a trade.

As always, this isn't a trading recommendation in any way. Trading Forex, or anything I guess, involves substantial risk and is not for the faint of heart.

© Dianne Fecteau, 2009. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without the express written permission of the author.

Ozzie and Guppy

You go, Ozzie! That’s what I feel like saying to this pair since it has broken out of its range yet again with a nice looking candle. But will it go? One encouraging sign is that it didn’t fall all the way back to the bottom of the consolidation range—it stopped well short of it which is bullish. The candles up since that point have been strong ones until the bearish piercing one that just completed. Note that it’s near the point where it fell back before some caution is warranted. It broke out overnight and in the early morning hours when I was sleeping so I didn’t take the trade on the breakout. What I’ll do now is see how it acts around this period before jumping in one way or the other. As I pointed out yesterday we’re still in an uptrend (since March) so the bias is to the long side. Here’s the three hour chart:

As far as the Guppy goes (GBP/JPY) it’s stuck in a small range as it tries to find its direction. In the chart below look at the beautiful symmetry of the moves and note that the second move up didn’t go as far as the length of the first one (I’ve marked the moves up with purple lines). I’m somewhat fanatical about proportion and symmetry because the market seems drawn to it as well. I’m still short in the pair (the tiny triangle marks where I took my short at 150.49). At this moment it’s at 135 pips profit. I still have my stop at a profit point of 80 pips at 149.69 and its high yesterday was 149.62 so that was a good stop. I may move it down a bit more since its high today so far has been 149.43. Whatever this pair now does, we know an important thing about it and that is that this narrow range of 148.06 (the low since I shorted it) to 150.49 is meaningful in some way. Otherwise it wouldn’t be hanging here. More to come. Note also how it rejects lower prices with long candle shadows in the past. It's not showing these here but that's not infallible. You have to combine things such as candles with support and resistance and other indicators before making decisions.

This is a frustrating week for me as a trader. Other committments keep demanding attention and I'm spending little time with the charts. But that's part of life and I'll be able to get back to it soon.

None of these are trade recommendations and trading involves substantial risk.

©Dianne L. Fecteau. No part of this can be excerpted without the author’s specific written permission.

Friday thoughts and the Guppy

After struggling a bit with the chart yesterday I decided to stay short the Guppy trade. Mostly the reason was that when I looked at it from different time frames and different perspectives, e.g. changing compression on the charts, I still believed in my reasons for getting into it. The pair managed to overcome its initial shock at touching 149.61 and has gone slumming as low as 148.62 this morning. It’s now over a 100 pips profit. Obviously, I’ve now moved my stop to lock in at least 50 pips. But will I close out? It is Friday, after all, and I often close all positions at the end of the week.

Take a look at the three hour chart now. It’s finding some support at the 148.60 level. There’s also some positive divergence with price and RSI. Of course, divergence is all over many charts right now. It may climb back up a bit. I think there’s more downward potential. But it doesn’t really matter what I think. At this point I need to pull back, look at what has happened this week to date, and make some decisions. In any case, it is what they so quaintly call a “free trade.” I can only make money on it now despite what happens.
To be honest the week has been a little frustrating. This is because of the sideways movements that largely took place in the pairs I traded. You can make some steady profits in this kind of market (and take small losses if you manage your stops). But let’s face it. The really big profits come from trending moves—being in at the right time and staying with it. And not taking small profits. For me this usually means that if I get a free trade going I stay with it if my analysis shows there could be more to come. That doesn’t mean I won’t take partial profits at a point. I did so this morning with the Guppy at 118 pips. That is how I quiet the savage and greedy beast within that shouts, bellows, and roars to take profits, any profits. Three pips? Five? Oh my, it starts to get excited. 15? 20? Now it positively palpitates with anticipation. At 50 it starts the heavy ammo—old messages from the past having to do with each and every one of my many, many failures in trading. When that fails to move me it jumps to parental assaults on my self esteem.

For a couple of years it won. I tried everything—reading, courses, various mind/body techniques. All helped to some degree but what finally did it for me was simple awareness of the feeling. Letting myself feel it and moving on. Without touching the keyboard. Sounds simple but it was devilishly difficult. I’ll write some more about it in an upcoming post this weekend.

Nothing I write here in this blog is a trade recommendation. Do not act on it as though it were. I hope to only share some of my own decision making process and some thoughts on the psychology and philosophy of trading. Especially when it’s so easy to fall into the me David without a sling shot, they Goliath mindset. Well maybe the me David, they Goliath is reality. But there is always a sling shot.

© Dianne Fecteau, 2009. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without the express written permission of the author.

AUD/USD

Last Thursday I went long the AUD/USD at .8586. I moved my stop Friday to .8596 and was taken out last night during the Asian session at that price. I just went long again at .8570 so I’m in at a slightly better price than the last trade. Had I not been mucking about with the Euro charts for so long or not gone for a cup of coffee I might have noticed when it hit the near bottom of the range but there you go.

One thing I won’t do in this blog is hypothesize about possible trades. Lots of people put out a lot of analysis that has nothing to do with whether or not they’re really trading. Jessie Livermore tells the story of a guy who was going to fight a dual the next day (Reminiscences of a Stock Operator, page 27).

His second asked him, “Are you a good shot?”
Well, said the dualist, “I can snap the stem of a wineglass at twenty paces,” and he looked modest.
“That’s all very well,” said the unimpressed second. “But can you snap the stem of the wineglass while the wineglass is pointing a loaded pistol straight at your heart?”

Like Jessie, I need to back my opinions with my money.

Looking at the three hour chart, there’s a range of .8543 to .8676. Another thing that struck me on the chart was the beautiful symmetry of the moves back in August. From there it moved out of its triangle and is currently in a consolidation range. It’s showing some symmetry here as well.

Notice that it’s well above the .618 retracement of the July to October ’08 move down. And, as I wrote last week, this .8500 area is significant historically, all the way back to the 1980s. My Gann calculations on different highs and lows also show the significance of this area. It has also cleared the .8524 high from back in September ‘08. Why do I consider that high significant? Because it was the last high before the egregious move down. So if it can get above its current range high of 8676 it might have some significant moves ahead. If it breaks below, it will also be significant.

With a trading range such as this, also known as a rectangle, box, or horizontal channel, the price must touch the support and resistance lines at least twice. Edwards and Magee, in their classic work Technical Analysis of Stock Trends, believed ranges were most often continuation patterns. It’s also worth noting that there are many false and premature breakouts (Encyclopedia of Chart Patterns, Bulkowski, 2000). Regardless, the pair will exit this range eventually. Even if you just trade support and resistance though, it’s a wide enough rectangle that you could pick up 70 to 100 pips with tight stops. However I’m hoping to not have that kind of trade because both the upside and downside on a breakout offers much more potential profit.

Another thing I like about the pair on this chart is that RSI isn’t falling too far on the reactions. That’s a bullish sign. I use RSI primarily for divergences and for such things as this and not usually for buy or sell signals depending on overbought or oversold levels. There is one concern here, though, in that the RSI is showing momentum is falling off so there is some divergence.

As usual, I’ll just have to continue to study price action. And of course I have a tight stop since I entered near the bottom of the range.

None of the above is a trade recommendation of course. Remember that trading involves substantial risk.

© Dianne Fecteau, 2009. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without the express written permission of the author.

EUR/USD Monday Morning

I'm still short the Euro but I did close out more than half of my position a little while ago. Take a look at the following 3 hour chart. It's still showing the weakness in the shorter time frame that I wrote about last week and some nice selling came in early in the Asian session last night. Then you see the hammer so the behavior of the current candle is going to determine whether the pair will continue to break down or whether it's going to pick up strength. Given the overall bullish sentiment and given the fact of triple witching this week (see my Sunday post), it's time to lighten up shorts for now. My stop is above the high this month of 1.4635 but I closed enough of my position that I will still be at slight profit on the trade as a whole if it takes out my stop.

The hourly chart also supports my decision to lighten up on my short. Although there is still weakness showing--the divergence between RSI and price and the breaking down through the upward trend line for both RSI and price, the market is slightly expanding rather than contracting. It will take a high above 1.4622 to maintain this expansion (and since high from last week is 1.4635 it would ideally close above that to show a continuing pattern of higher highs and higher lows). Why not take the paltry profit and get out completely at this point? Well, we're at a very interesting price level based on my Gann analysis on the numbers of extreme highs and lows and of the fib level 1.4623 from high of 1.6041 to low of 1.2329. So we'll just have to see and the only way to see is to watch the price action.

None of the above is a trade recommendation. It's only my musings. We all know that trading carries a substantial degree of risk.

© Dianne Fecteau, 2009. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without the express written permission of the author.

Waiting for Entries

What will the Euro do this coming week? It doesn’t take much in the way of technical analysis to see that the pair is in an uptrend. Then there was the strong move up this past week—it started the week at 1.4295 and ended it at 1.4570 (the high for the week was 1.4635). Sentiment is bullish, judging by the news reports (see the word cloud from the last post). Even if you believe that this is a primary wave correction (Elliott wave speak), there’s little doubt, it seems, it could go higher, possibly up to 1.48 or so. But as I said in my last post it’s not moving right now. If you want to go long you’d have to wait for a reasonable entry point. So two questions:

1) If you were going to go long where is a reasonable entry point?
2) What do you do while you wait for it to get to that point? That’s the forbearance part I mentioned last time.

The first question is easy. Depending on your approach you can answer it a number of ways. I could use my 3 hour P&F chart I posted last time and hope for a retracement back to 1.4420/45. The pair closed Friday at 1.4570; its daily average true range (ATR) is 129. So that wouldn’t be such a stretch. Or I could use Fib levels, which would also bring me in at 1.4410/55. Finally, I could wait for something with more upside potential such as letting price come back to an uptrend line drawn from May which also coincides roughly with the 50 EMA on the daily chart. That would mean I’d enter around 1.4225/75. That would probably require waiting a few days at least. (Note that if I did take that approach, I’d want to carefully assess market conditions when it reached that point). Or I could wait for it to break out of some major resistance levels which would involve the highs in late 2008.

Why not just go long now if you think the Euro is bullish? Jessie Livermore answered it best when he wrote, “In a narrow market when prices are not getting anywhere to speak of but move within a narrow range, there is no sense trying to anticipate what the next big movement is going to be—up or down. The thing to do is to watch the market…and make up your mind that you will not take an interest until the price breaks through in either direction.” (Reminiscences of a Stock Operator, 1993)

Regardless of approach, what do you do while you’re waiting for your entry? If you think a market is going up you can fall into being fearful that you’ll lose out. This can make you jump in when the market is at a top. One answer is distraction. This can be as simple as putting on your headphones and listening to some music or doing the analysis on another pair. Or focus on how much you can lose if you’re wrong. Actually write down the numbers or plug them into Excel. Read them out loud to yourself. Traders often trade from the silence of their inner thoughts or with the babble of financial news in the background. Hearing your voice speak the results of an analysis, especially if it involves potential loss, can be effective in combating the urge to just put on a trade.

Relaxation anchoring is another technique. You do this by practicing progressive relaxation and then, when deeply relaxed, breathe in with the phrase, “I am relaxed,” and exhale with the phrase, “I am calm.” Each time you say the word “relaxed” squeeze your right thumb. If you practice this a few times it will only take squeezing your right thumb to bring on a more relaxed state during your normal activities. You can also anchor to a pleasant experience. I’ll include some audio links sometime in the future with both these approaches. Email me at dianne@feldyusa.com or post a comment with your email if you want to be on a list to receive them.

None of the above is a trade recommendation—in fact I’m short the Euro right now but that’s not a trade recommendation either.

© Dianne Fecteau, 2009. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without the express written permission of the author.

EUR/USD

The EUR/USD had a nice run up earlier this week but it's not moving worth a sou right now. Where's the action? But this is what trading is all about--waiting for another move that will be definitive. Trading is nothing if not about patience and yet patience is the one trait many traders seem to lack. Actually, patience isn't the bon mot. It's too bland. Forebearance would be better--a determined struggle to not give in to negative feelings. How many times has someone bailed out of a trade after the pair waffled back and forth and then watched as it took off in whatever direction one was originally in? Or, getting into a trade, one starts to second guess oneself?

There are various ways to cope with this and I'll be getting into some of them over the weekend. For now, I thought I'd amuse myself by building a word cloud of some of the recent news about the Euro. Isn't that cute?

The first chart is my 3 hour/3 box P&F chart, based on close. It shows the uptrend, an engaging consolidation period, and the pair is now at a key resistance level. If it can break through....but I'm getting ahead of myself. Note the symmetry in time of the last moves up. It evokes the three-drive pattern from which one could expect a break down.

The last chart is the hourly updated from yesterday. One could still make the case for the broadening pattern but there is also the appearance of an upward wedge with its two upsloping lines and multiple touches. However, one could also argue for a pennant.

More important to me is that there has been selling that has come in several times when the pair has achieved this level (take a look at the 15-minute chart). So even in the face of the strong uptrend, I feel OK with my short with its teensy-weensy, yellow polka dotted stop. Remember, I will reverse myself if and when taken out, depending on what the market shows me.

Now I have to remind anyone reading this that these aren't trade recommendations. They're just my musings. All trading carries significant risks the lawyers tell us to say. And you know something? They're right. That's why I keep my stops small.

EUR/USD

Well here's the deal with this pair. It's been in an uptrend on the monthly, weekly, and daily charts (as well as on the 3 hour since early September after a consolidation period). With that kind of trending one wants to wait for a pullback to enter.

Had I been on top of things the last hour or so I might have gone long on the pullback on the hourly this morning to 1.4503 with the close at 1.4534. Especially since that was a nice little Fib retracement from the prior low at 1.4467. I wasn't. I didn't.

But there are some other interesting things going on in this pair. Look at the hourly chart above and notice the uptrend lines in both black and orange. Price dipped its teeny tiny toes below the orange line (baby, it's cold down there) and fell below the RSI orange uptrend line yesterday. (sorry, for the funky dates on my charts from Oanda. Today is the 10th but they show it as the 9th--this plays hell with any cycle work I'd be inclined to engage in, I can tell you. Or movements of the planets...oh well, let's save that topic).

The black uptrend line on price shows a divergence with the black downtrend line on RSI. So price going up and momentum is going down. Uh-oh.

The other chart shows a broadening formation on the hourly. I take these seriously. Taking something seriously doesn't mean I'd trade it in and of itself. But now I've got three rather bearish indicators on the EUR/USD hourly. If I look at the candle formations themselves I see a nice strong black candle three bars back and also some indecision with the candle shadows. But this is only the hourly so let's not get too, too carried away with the analysis or start hopping to conclusions. What I'd like to see next is another touch at the high of the broadening formation or a bit higher. Then I might try a short and I can use a fairly tight stop to get me out if price merrily continues past that point, assuming if it happens, that the trend is still very much in force.

Watch the price; watch the price; watch the price. Too many times we trade our expectations. "I'm bullish on the Euro; therefore it must continue up." Or "The Euro is over-valued given economic conditions in Eurozone; therefore it must go down." Uh-uh-uh. While expectations can help us make sense of situations in life--i.e. we can fill in a conversation if we miss a word or two or u cn rd a txt msg despite missing letters--it can cause traders to make stupid and foolish errors, i.e. "Me think bull so I'll ignore the bear signs," or "me big bear so even if it's going up the pair can't be bullish."

Don't trade your expectations.

Long entry into AUD/USD

As soon as I woke up this morning I entered the AUD/USD long based on the analysis in my prior post from the weekend. That's the picture on the right (I'm having a little trouble posting pictures but I'll figure it out). I wish I'd woken up a bit earlier but there you go. In any case, even though it was up only 30 pips at this point I decided to move my stop to breakeven (the red line) because I'm thinking I can get a better entry on a pullback. I'm a technical trader so I don't pay a lot of attention to news. But I'm wondering if the good news from Australia (businesss conditions up and more important, business confidence up) isn't behind this quick spike.

I also went long GBP/USD this morning (the chart on the left above) but only after getting stopped out from a short. I honestly think this pair is weaker than it's acting but price behavior trumps my opinion at the moment. After some nice long candles, though, there's a little uncertainty being indicated by the market. Its stop is also moved up to breakeven plus 10. Here's that entry on the hourly chart.

Hedging

Sometimes traders, usually inexperienced or going through a period where fear is the prevailing emotion, decide to “hedge.” Using the case of the AUD/USD in my previous posting they might decide to take two trades—one long and one short in the same pair.

Is this a good idea? After all, if you have tight stops and it starts to run in one direction…

The answer is no.

First, this isn’t really hedging which has to do with exploiting inefficiencies across different markets. The kind of trader that would “hedge” this situation usually is one who has a few other walls to climb, e.g. they close out trades too quickly and don’t adhere to tight stops. You can’t make money this way. In fact, you can lose money.

Technical trading requires hard work; technical trading requires making an informed decision.

Gann wrote in How to Make Profits in Commodities, “Many traders have the idea…they can hedge and protect themselves. There is no greater mistake than this. It often turns out the trader loses on both trades. If you are in the market WRONG (Gann used the caps) and don’t know what to do, there is but one thing to do. Get out and wait until you know there is a definite trend….[Hedging] does not pay and you must avoid it.”

Gartley wrote, “The first and most important part of this analytical procedure is the accurate determination of existing supply and demand conditions.” (Profits in the Stock Market) This requires study and hard work. He also wrote, “the technical approach also appeals to many persons because the vast majority are inherently lazy….[but] the technical approach…demands constant study and the application of reasonable judgment.”

Back in July there was brouhaha over the new NFA rules regarding hedging. People wrote posts on forums saying they were going to open accounts with brokers outside the USA because they could no longer hedge. Many of the brokers played into this misunderstanding of the ruling.

FXCM, in its communication to its users on this rule, wrote, “forex traders will no longer have the ability to selectively place stop-loss or limit orders on individual trades, nor will traders be able to modify or close trades from the “Open Positions” window.”

This is not what the rule said. The rule said FIFO—first in; first out.. The first trade you open must be the trade you close first. If you go long and then try to “hedge” by opening a short position, you must close the first long position out before you can open the short position. It has nothing to do with not being able to place stops on any given trade. It has nothing to do with not being able to set profit targets on a given trade. It also doesn’t say you can’t have two trades in the same direction. (Scaling in? Let’s talk about that some other time). Of course you can also have two accounts where you have a long in one and a short in the other in the same pair.

NFA defines hedging as “where customers take long and short positions in the same currency pair in the same account.” The people at NFA think you don’t “understand either the lack of economic benefit or the financial costs involved.” They think you won’t be able to be profitable with this kind of approach. They also think it, “increases the customer’s financial costs in several ways.”

They have a point. When you buy long and sell short on the same pair you pay the spread twice. In addition, while one would think that the interest paid or received on the two opposite positions would offset, this doesn’t seem to be reality in many cases. In part this is because of the squirrely ways some brokers deal with interest.

It’s not my argument that government should be regulating traders to death. Hey, maybe if people want to throw their money away they should be allowed to do so. Regardless of how you feel about that, this rule actually addresses something that gives people the allusion they’re in control. God knows, many of us felt out of control when we first started trading. Some continue to feel that way—buffeted by an irrational market; stops being gunned by the big players; that some system or guru somewhere has the knowledge so desperately needed.

But I digress. The idea of hedging the same pair isn’t for the trader who wants to learn to be successful. To this kind of hedging I paraphrase George Carlin: “It’s BS folks and it’s bad for you.”